Delta Land Dispute Turns Ugly: Community Clashes with Oil Firm Over Alleged Takeover

 

Axxela, a major oil and gas firm, is at the center of a heated land dispute with the Emu-Ebendo community in Ndokwa West Local Government Area, Delta State. The controversy erupted after community members staged a protest, demanding the company’s immediate exit from a portion of land they claim was wrongfully acquired.

 

The protesters insist that a

2003 Supreme Court ruling affirmed their ownership of the land, which, according to them, includes the portion now occupied by Axxela. They allege that the company bypassed their community and acquired the land through another group, raising questions about the legitimacy of the transaction.

 

However, Axxela has dismissed these allegations,insisting that its acquisition was lawful, transparent, and in compliance with all regulatory requirements.

 

Axxela Defends Land Acquisition, Residents Cry Foul

 

In a statement issued by its Corporate Communications Manager, Omolara Shitu the company stated that the land in Umuseti, Delta State, was acquired through a rigorous due diligence process including consultations with relevant family houses and government approvals.

 

We have obtained a registered deed of assignment, with the Governor’s consent granted in December 2024,demonstrating our lawful purchase of the land,” the statement read.

 

But community leaders argue that no amount of documentation can override a Supreme Court judgment, accusing Axxela of using corporate influence to override their legal rights.

 

Fear of Corporate Exploitation, Environmental Risks Loom

 

The standoff has reignited long-standing tensions between oil and gas firms and host communities in the Niger Delta, where allegations of land grabbing, environmental degradation, and corporate exploitation are common.

 

While Axxela emphasizes its commitment to development and job creation protesters argue that similar promises by oil and gas firms in the region have often led to displacement, pollution, and broken agreements.

 

“Axxela talks about job creation, but what about our land? What about our future? We are tired of these companies coming here and taking what belongs to us,” said one protester.

 

Will Dialogue Resolve the Tension or Is Legal Action Next?

 

Axxela says it remains open to dialogue to resolve any grievances and discourages the spread of misinformation that could escalate tensions. But with the community standing firm on the Supreme Court ruling, the dispute could escalate into legal battles, protests, or even a potential shutdown of the project.

 

As tensions rise, the key question remains: Is Axxela operating within the law, or is this another case of corporate power trampling on local rights?