Edo APC Chairman Risks Jail As Banwo & Ighodalo Prepares Legal Action Over Defamation/Vop

Nigerian law firm Banwo & Ighodalo has initiated legal proceedings against Jarrett Tenebe, Acting Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Edo State, over alleged defamatory statements made about the firm’s founding partner, Mr. Asue Ighodalo.

In a letter dated December 18, 2024, signed by senior advocate Abimbola Akeredolu (SAN), the firm described Tenebe’s claims as “reckless, libelous, and without foundation.” The controversy stems from a December 17 interview on TMC TV/Radio, where Tenebe accused Mr. Ighodalo of stealing 21 government vehicles from the Edo State Government.

Banwo & Ighodalo noted that these allegations persisted despite a December 11 demand letter requiring an immediate retraction and public apology. Tenebe has now been given three days to comply or face a formal lawsuit.

In a separate statement, the Team Asue Media Organisation (TAMO) categorically denied the accusations, labelling them as a calculated smear campaign intended to damage Mr. Ighodalo’s reputation. TAMO spokesperson Erhabor Emokpae dismissed the allegations as baseless and devoid of any credible evidence.

The statement clarified that Mr. Ighodalo served as Chairman ofAlaghodaro, a private-sector-driven initiative aimed at promoting economic growth in Edo State. It emphasized that Mr. Ighodalo had consistently funded his expenses during his 16 years of public service, including his tenure withAlaghodaro, underscoring his integrity and selflessness.

Banwo & Ighodalo has reiterated its determination to seek legal redress if Tenebe fails to retract his statements within the stipulated timeframe. The firm criticized the growing trend of weaponizing false information for political gains, warning that such actions undermine public trust and erode democratic institutions.

A senior partner at the firm commented: “This matter goes beyond defending Mr. Ighodalo’s character. It is about preserving the sanctity of truth in public discourse and holding individuals accountable for the spread of baseless allegations.”

Attempts by The Guardian to reach Mr. Tenebe for comments proved futile as of the time of posting this report, but observers have linked the APC chieftain’s statements to ongoing political tensions in Edo State. Critics argue that the accusations are part of a broader strategy to distract the public and shift focus away from pressing governance issues.

Legal experts have noted that defamation cases, particularly those involving high-profile individuals, often serve as litmus tests for the integrity of public discourse and the legal system.

If Mr. Tenebe does not comply with the demands for retraction and apology, the case is expected to proceed to court. This development could set a significant precedent for addressing defamation in Nigeria’s political landscape. Further updates on the case are anticipated as the deadline approaches.