President Bola Tinubu pleaded with the Supreme Court not to admit any fresh evidence from Atiku Abubakar, particularly the deposition of Caleb Westberg, registrar of Chicago State University (CSU), on the grounds that it was “alien” to the proceedings since it was not initially tendered at the first court of trial.
Mr Tinubu asserted that the senior court must not encourage Mr Abubakar’s behaviour of first filing bogus petitions and relegating the supply of evidence to buttress his claims till later. The president noted that his rival demonstrated the same behaviour at the election’s petitions tribunal.
He further urged the apex court not to countenance the evidence of forgery submitted by Mr Abubakar because it was never entered into the records or judgement of the tribunal that upheld his election victory and formed the basis of the plaintiffs’ appeal.
You do recall that, Mr Abubakar, after several weeks of legal back-and-forths at the U.S. Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Chicago, succeeded in obtaining Mr Tinubu’s CSU educational records.
The registrar’s deposition further revealed that despite Mr Tinubu’s attendance and graduation from the university, the institution never issued him an original or replacement certificate.
Following Mr Westberg’s testimony, Mr Abubakar and many Nigerians are now curious about where and how Mr Tinubu obtained the certificate he submitted to INEC.
But the presidential candidate of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) is determined to annul Mr Tinubu’s election victory, citing section 137(j) of the constitution, which stipulates that no person shall be eligible to be president if “he has presented a forged certificate to the Independent National Electoral Commission.”
, on the grounds that it was “alien” to the proceedings since it was not initially tendered at the first court of trial.){kind=link}