“US Lawmaker Says Trump Might Use Sanctions, Not Military, in Nigeria”

VOP NG reports that U.S. Congressman Bill Huizenga has downplayed the chances of President Donald Trumpordering direct military action in Nigeria, saying the president’s forceful statements likely reflect frustration with escalating violence rather than an imminent plan for an invasion.

Speaking in an interview with Arise TV, Huizenga said Washington is more apt to pursue non‑military tools — notably targeted economic sanctions and travel restrictions — to pressure those responsible for attacks, particularly those directed at Christians and moderate Muslims.

“I was surprised that the president spoke so forcefully,” Huizenga told Arise TV. “But I don’t see direct military intervention in Nigeria as a high priority. I believe he would prefer other forms of action to stop what he views as genocide against Christians and others.”

The congressman argued that sanctions aimed at individuals and organisations would be more effective in disrupting the financial and logistical networks that sustain violent groups.

[irp posts=”47070″ ]

“Sanctions cut off the flow of money and the ability to move people. We don’t yet know exactly who finances many of these operations, whether from Fulani groups or Boko Haram, but applying economic pressure will have an impact,” he said.

Huizenga also suggested that Trump’s record of favouring diplomacy over protracted military engagements reduces the likelihood of an immediate strike.

“Frankly, this president has been someone who pursues peace rather than expanding war; he would be very selective before taking military action,” the lawmaker added.

The remarks come after President Trump labelled Nigeria a “country of particular concern” and warned that Washington could cut aid or even consider military options if mass killings continue. In a social media post cited by SaharaReporters, Trump called on Congress to act quickly and said the United States “cannot stand by” while religious minorities are targeted.

Huizenga noted, however, that the U.S. still lacks a clear picture of who is bankrolling the violence — a factor that makes sanctions and financial restrictions a logical first step while intelligence and diplomatic channels are pursued.

VOP NG will continue to follow responses from both the Nigerian government and U.S. policymakers as the situation develops.