Nigeria at risk: Darlington alleges deadly plot against Tinubu’s Presidency

A legal practitioner and political analyst, Barrister Darlington Agomuo has raised serious concerns about what he describes as the “total capture” of Nigeria’s democratic institutions.

Speaking on Voice of the People 90.3FM Evening Rush Program, on Thursday, Barrister Agomuo revealed details of an alleged “decapitation unit” allegedly formed to destabilize the presidency.

According to Agomuo, intelligence reports indicate the existence of a specialized unit with plans to seize Aso Rock and neutralize top leadership, including President Bola Tinubu and Vice President Kashim Shettima.

The plot reportedly included attacks on strategic infrastructure such as the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport and military barracks, aiming to provoke a total government collapse.

“The plan was not just a protest; it was a coordinated effort by a ‘decapitation unit’ to take out the leadership of this country and seize the seat of power,” Mr Agomuo said, citing multiple intelligence briefings.

Controversial UK loan for port upgrades

Mr Agomuo also criticized the federal government’s £746 million loan agreement with the United Kingdom for the refurbishment of the Apapa and Tin Can Island ports. 

He described the deal as “lopsided,” arguing it undermines Nigeria’s industrial sovereignty. The terms reportedly require the use of British steel, raising concerns over the impact on local industries such as the Ajaokuta Steel Mill.

Institutional capture and the public impact

The analyst warned that the legislature and judiciary have effectively become “paper entities” under executive influence, resulting in what he calls “institutional capture.” 

He cautioned that if this trend continues, citizens could face severe restrictions, with political affiliations increasingly dictating access to basic economic activities.

Background

Agomuo’s warnings come at a time of economic tension in Nigeria, with recent reforms leading to rising inflation and public discontent. 

Critics argue that the government’s approach to foreign loans and institutional oversight could further destabilize the political and economic environment.